<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sirrobbierob.com/2008/09/google-chrome.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sirrobbierob.com/2008/09/google-chrome.html</link>
	<description>Makes Sense to Me!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-RC1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirRobbieRob</title>
		<link>http://www.sirrobbierob.com/2008/09/google-chrome.html/comment-page-1#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>SirRobbieRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirrobbierob.com/?p=438#comment-174</guid>
		<description>The idea behind Chrome is an awesome one. I think the execution so far is weak. It reminds me a lot of Cuill coming out and saying they are better than Google and falling flat on their face. Google should have announced this after having more add-on available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea behind Chrome is an awesome one. I think the execution so far is weak. It reminds me a lot of Cuill coming out and saying they are better than Google and falling flat on their face. Google should have announced this after having more add-on available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.sirrobbierob.com/2008/09/google-chrome.html/comment-page-1#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sirrobbierob.com/?p=438#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Totally agreed UNTIL I read this http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/

Completely agree it is nothing to wow on the surface.. yet. It&#039;s what they are doing behind-the-scenes that is pretty groundbreaking. Definitely a new approach and one that should make more apps look at different approaches. Specifically multi-process vs. multi-threaded. BIG change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agreed UNTIL I read this <a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/</a></p>
<p>Completely agree it is nothing to wow on the surface.. yet. It&#8217;s what they are doing behind-the-scenes that is pretty groundbreaking. Definitely a new approach and one that should make more apps look at different approaches. Specifically multi-process vs. multi-threaded. BIG change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
